Search This Blog

Monday, January 15, 2018

Martin Luther King Day



It is Martin Luther King Day, and I just finished reading the “Letter from the Birmingham Jail,” written by Dr. King in response to the criticism he received from white clergymen over his decision to take nonviolent action to protest systemic racism. You can find the letter published on the Washington Post’s website here.

As I read the letter, it struck me that there are parallels between how we as a society are dealing with racism, and with the threat posed by climate change. In both cases, broad patterns of facts are disregarded in favor of intense fighting over specific situations. In both cases, accepting and confronting those broader patterns of facts require a fundamental reorganization of how our society works. In both cases, the status quo involves leaving power and economic structures intact, without disturbing the immediate comfort of those who benefit at the cost of those who do not. In both cases, the status quo means not only perpetuating harsh consequences of social and environmental injustice, but also a deferred but terrible price for those who currently benefit from the status quo.

Currently, there is sharp debate raging over whether DonaldTrump is a racist. Yet in the same newspapers in recent months, other stories have reported that black women are far more likely to suffer from deadly complications during and following childbirth, that opioids were far more likely to be prescribed to white patients, that black men are far more likely to suffer from excessive use of force by police, that young black children are far more likely to be given suspensions from school for misbehavior that earns white children reprimands. Efforts to “ensure the integrity of the voting system” also systematically disenfranchise large numbers of people of color. The list goes on. These are all examples of systemic racism.

Does it matter what Donald Trump said in any given instance? Certainly this administration has made no effort at all to address the terrible inequities facing American citizens of African descent, or other citizens whose genetic heritage is not predominantly western European. By extension, the question then becomes one of how much have the rest of us have resisted, and responded to these larger patterns of injustice. Perhaps it shouldn’t be just black football players who take the knee, metaphorically or otherwise.

Similarly, the “debate” over global warming centers on large arguments over small fragments of data. Does the “heat island” effect explain warming? (No, it does not). The last 20 years don’t show warming (that argument limited itself to data from only the atmosphere, and it isn’t accurate anyway). Arguing over whether tree ring data really fit this or that pattern is ludicrous in view of the extraordinary range of data that all point to the same conclusion. Given that, the fact that we haven’t yet quite figured out the role of low-elevation clouds caused by diesel particles seems rather insignificant. The larger patterns will speak for themselves, if we pay attention.

This presidential administration has shown itself to be openly defiant of facts, willfully ignoring data for belief, and has skillfully used the stories we create about ourselves to inflame denial, hatred and fear. Stories are indeed a powerful component of the human psyche. Yet, deliberately overlooking the stories told by broad patterns of facts in the service of protecting our own little stories is neither worthy of the ideals upon which this nation was founded, nor an effective strategy to protect ourselves from the violent changes that denial will bring in the end. We are far better off choosing the story framed by the ideals of Dr. King than the dark, dystopian story that has swept over our national discourse over the last two years.

It is fitting we have set aside a day to honor one of the greatest American citizens who ever lived. It is even more fitting when the conversation today centered on how we move forward to ensure that the facts, those stubborn things, are recognized, so that we can realistically assess how far we have yet to go on our journey toward true equality and justice, indeed our species’ long-term survival. We will all need to face the best version of truth that we have in order to begin the move toward solutions.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

The Natural History of Skunk Stink

I never knew that fresh skunk spray smells exactly like burning rubber.

Instead, as my dog leaped into the back porch after his brief pre-dawn potty break in the yard, I thought it was just some new form of particularly odious flatulence.  This dog often has gas, and I had not yet had coffee.  However, as I bent down to wipe his feet and the odor increased sharply in its intensity, I realized that my dog wasn't directly responsible for the stench.  He seemed unconcerned, but he loves stinky odors, and the spray had missed his face.

There had been strong sulfurous fumes in the back yard for the previous week.  It was almost March, and the skunks were stirring, looking for food and for love after winter.  They are not shy about wandering around outside our house, although because they are normally strictly nocturnal we almost never see them. Skunks will spray predators that threaten them, but a female skunk will also spray persistent males bent on mating if she's really just not in the mood.  Skunks aim quite well, so I suspected that my dog had interrupted an unhappy love affair and been splattered by the consequences.

striped skunk
Striped skunk, Mephitis mephitis. Photo: NPS

Anal glands are used by many species of mammal as the creators of scent calling cards; when your dog sniffs around another dog's feces, she's most likely focused on the droplets of scent secretion that are released during defecation.  Possums also use anal gland secretion as a method of self-defense, but only skunks have the ability to take aim and fire.  Skunks' glands are quite large, over an inch or three centimeters long, and each of the pair is equipped with a nipple-like structure called a papilla that acts as a movable nozzle.  The glands contract with enough force to send the oily ooze flying ten feet or 3 meters distance. 

Skunks are born blind and helpless, but their glands contain musk by the end of their first week, and they are capable of spraying at the age of 17 days, more than two weeks before their eyes open for the first time.  Researchers found that young skunks were more likely than adults to spray than to run, hide, or charge.  I found no reliable reports of how long it takes for a skunk to refill its glands after a full discharge.  Presumably it takes some energy and time, because skunks give plenty of warning before firing, and don't seem willing to use all of their supply in a single encounter unless they must.

 Spotted skunk or civet cat.
 Striped skunks.  Image from http://wdfw.wa.gov/living/skunks.html

Elements of the chemical composition of the spray were described as early as 1862 by German chemists, and a fellow German named Dr. O. Low did his best to continue the inquiry during an expedition to Texas in 1872.  Low commented on the abundant opportunity to collect skunks and their musk during his travels, but his companions objected so vigorously to the ensuing odor that he was forced to abandon his efforts.  He was further stymied from studying his few skimpy samples by colleagues and students in the college at which he worked "when the whole college rose in revolt, shouting 'A skunk, a skunk is here!' I had to abandon the investigation." 

 A more thorough treatment of the chemical elements of skunk spray was published in 1896 by Thomas Aldrich of Johns Hopkins University, who managed to obtain the glands of a number of skunks collected in Maine. “I have been more fortunate than my predecessors in being surrounded by those who, for the cause of science, would endure even the odor of a skunk in close proximity,” Aldrich wrote. 

 Aldrich found that the fluid’s vapors were highly flammable and gave off sulfur dioxide when burned.  He also discovered that even humans can sense the presence of these compounds at concentrations of ten parts per billion. This is equivalent to tasting a pinch of salt distributed across one ton of potato chips.  

Striped skunk. 
Spotted skunk, Spirogale gracilis 
Image from http://wdfw.wa.gov/living/skunks.html

The composition of the musk is astonishing.  Over 150 compounds containing sulfur have been isolated.  Even more interestingly, each species of skunk has its own chemical signature. The striped skunk’s musk contains seven major volatile compounds, including three thiols, three thioacetate derivatives, and an alkaloid compound, 2-methylquinoline, which is also used in pharmaceuticals including anti-malarial drugs.

 The recurring skunky smell of a previously sprayed dog who seemed odor-free until the dry fur is dampened results from the reaction between water and one of the thioacetate derivatives remaining in the fur, creating one of the more volatile and smelly thiol compounds.  I found nothing in the literature regarding that first stench of burning rubber, but the odor had morphed into the sickening, familiar sulfur smell by breakfast time.  The highly volatile chemicals responsible for the first overwhelming impression must have already begun breaking down in the presence of water and oxygen in the air.


To get rid of the odor, the thiols need to be converted to other, less objectionable chemicals.  Exposure to oxygen will lead to their conversion to sulfonic acids.  Tomato juice or other acids do not accomplish this critical piece of chemistry, although a properly prepared solution of hydrogen peroxide will do the trick. Regarding the well-established folklore regarding tomato juice, the authors of the book Land Mammals of Oregon commented, "Don’t waste good tomato juice- add a little vodka and drink it; it won’t reduce the odor, but the odor won’t bother you so much!”


I didn't have any tomato juice or vodka on hand, only a bottle of doggy shampoo.  I went to work at once, and by dawn, the dog was still stinking with sulfur, but now had undertones of green tea and lavender.  At least he was clean.  Fortunately, olfactory fatigue had set in, and we stopped noticing the stench unless we left the house for a while.

 I'm not sure my dog has learned his lesson. I'll pay more attention to the atmosphere of early morning next year, making sure that no bad love is in the air before flinging open the door.  Or at least, I'll make coffee first.

References

Aldrich, Thomas B. 1896. A chemical study of the secretion of the anal glands of Mephitis mephitica (common skunk), with remarks on the physiological properties of this secretion.  Journal of Experimental Medicine 1:323-340.

Anderson, K. K., D. T. Bernstein, R. L. Caret, and L. J. Romanczyk, Jr. 1982. Chemical constituents of the defensive secretion of the striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis). Tetrahedron 38:1965-1970.

Medill, S.A., A. Renard, and S. Larivie. 2001. Onogeny of antipredator behavior in striped skunks, Mephitis mephitis. Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 23(1):41-48.

Verts, B. J., and L. N. Carraway. 1998. Land Mammals of Oregon. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

Wood, W. F. 1989.  New components in defensive secretion of the striped skunk, Mephitis mephitis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16:2057-2065.

Wood, W. F. 1999. The history of skunk defensive secretion research. Chemical educator 4:44-50.

Wood, W. F., B. G. Sollers, G. A. Dragoo, and J. W. Dragoo. 2002.   Volatile components in defensive spray of the hooded skunk, Mephitis macroura.  Journal of Chemical Ecology 28:1865-1870.

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Possum Soup

The racket had gone on for quite some time, and it was getting hard to ignore.  I was up in my attic room, studying during the days of coursework for my master's degree in wildlife science.  The rattle of pots had gone from a brief shimmy of sound that you might think you really hadn't heard to a steady clatter.  I had a hypothesis.  A few days before, a rat had come in from the dairy barns, and chewed up a wooden spoon I'd used to make jam.  A repeat visit appeared to be underway.  I wasn't interested in facing down a rat in the cupboard, but the call to some kind of confrontation became unavoidable.  Reluctantly, I headed down the stairs.

I'm often told by people who want to become wildlife biologists that they are motivated by their love of animals and of being outside.  I try not to tell them that most biologist spend an obscene amount of time tied to a computer keyboard, because a few of us manage to escape that fate.  Who am I to accidentally discourage the next extraordinary naturalist-ecologist? For myself, however, some of my best wildlife encounters have occurred when I've been off-duty, although admittedly nearly always when I'm away from my desk.

That evening, I left my makeshift desk and climbed down the attic stairs.  Grabbing the broom as some means of self-defense, I flipped on the light switch and cautiously opened the cupboard door.  A sharp face decorated with glistening button eyes and spiky hair gazed back at me.  Not a rat.  A young possum sat in a saucepan, its tail arching up into a question mark, punctuating perfectly the look of bemused confusion on its face.

Much better than a rat, but if I left the possum there, I would get none of my work done, and I doubted that staying in the cupboard was what the possum had in mind for the evening's agenda.  The saucepan handle was angled toward me.  I cautiously extended a hand toward it, thinking the easiest solution was simply to carry the pan to the door and unceremoniously dump the possum into the bushes off the porch.

The possum froze for a moment, and hissed.  The hiss was almost exploratory, as if the possum had not yet had to do this before and wasn't quite sure of the etiquette of self-defense.  Despite its uncertainty, the impressive teeth were on full display.  I decided that this was not the time for experiential education, and withdrew my hand.

The possum then seemed to realize that it was in a compromising position.  It scrambled out of the saucepan and retreated to the back corner of the shelf, still facing me.  I thought about trying to prod it out with the broom, but playing broom hockey in the tight quarters of the kitchen with an upset possum wasn’t the resolution I was looking for.  Then as I squatted, staring into the dark recess of the cabinet and wondering what to do, I could have sworn the possum was shrinking.

After a moment or two, there was no doubt about it- there was much less possum left on the top shelf.  The shelf had been poorly cut, leaving a large gap in the corner chosen.  The possum's backside had started to descend through the gap, the back legs and tail hanging down into the lower shelf space, the front legs and paws now pinned to the side of its head as it sank still further.

I grabbed the largest kettle, and positioned it under the possum's dangling backside.  I coaxed the rest of the animal through by tapping gently on its head with the broom, and finally gravity brought the possum down into the kettle with an audible plop.  Moving quickly, before the possum could regain its composure, I slipped the lid onto the kettle and carried it outside, the possum scrabbling impotently against its enameled prison.  The possum's vague uncertainty about the whole misadventure prompted me to simply tip the kettle on its side rather than flinging the contents out into the blackberry thicket.  I stood and watched as the possum ambled out, blinked a few times, and then unhurriedly slipped off the edge of the deck and disappeared into the darkness.  Equilibrium was restored.

I wished the young possum well, and returned to my attic and the theoretical study of wildlife.  My housemate later admitted he'd left the door open all morning, and had even heard a faint scrabbling that must have been the possum settling into the cabinet to get out of the unwelcome early daylight. The noise then stopped, so he did not bother to investigate.  He laughed when I told him of our visitor, and I've never had such a good look at a live possum since.

I'd much rather encounter the natural world on its terms rather than my own, and watch what unfolds without the need to capture, tag, measure, or otherwise harass whatever it is I'm studying.  We can learn a lot from ecological research when we design it properly and all goes well.  It is an important kind of information.  But I'm convinced that we can learn just as much by being more attentive to the everyday interactions we have with the lives of all of those around us, no educational degrees required.

Friday, December 21, 2012

Black Ice


One year, the cold came quickly, brutally, and without wind.  The ice that formed in the stillness was black ice, so clear it was as if you stepped out on a layer of glass over the water.  Most ice traps tiny air bubbles as it freezes, causing the transparency of water to transform into translucent gray-blue.  This ice was terrifying in both its slickness and in its transparency.  I stood stiff-legged and looked down between my feet at vegetation on the bottom undulating gently in the slight current that wound through the pond. 

 My dog would not follow me.  She clearly did not like the transparency, and when after much coaxing she put her front paws cautiously on the strange surface, she slipped and fell.  Enough.  If my sixteen-year-old self thought that this strange ice was safe, it was my affair.  She whined and paced from the banks as I slithered carefully around the pond's surface, tracing the underwater pathways of the beaver, studying logs and stumps and drowned debris, the aquatic plants rooted on the mucky bottom.  I skirted the standing snags around which the ice would not be as strong, but otherwise went at will over the translucent surface.  It was a unique and extraordinary look into the inner workings of the pond, and I have never seen such ice since.

 Shoup Glacier, Prince William Sound, Alaska, 1990

I’ve had other extraordinary encounters with ice.  I lived under the cold stare of a tidewater glacier in Alaska one summer, always on edge for a calving that might send up a shock wave of frigid water rocking up the shallow beach into our camp.  We maneuvered zodiacs among the glacial bergs, ever watchful.  Once I sat admiring the graceful stillness of an ice tower floating silently on the calm water when without warning, the ice rolled over.  The tower became a potentially deadly arm striking the water before submerging.  The newly exposed keel bobbed gently for a moment or two, then all motion ceased and the morning continued as if nothing had ever changed.

Two towers calved from the Columbia Glacier, Prince William Sound, Alaska 1990. Note the main berg floating just below the water's surface.

Once we took ice for granted. It still seems cheap and easy, dumped into glasses of water no one intends to drink, casually spilled onto the grass when a cooler is empty of picnic goodies and no longer needed.  Ice on water was also once a given, and the lakes of the Maine of my childhood sprouted small forests of ice-fishing shacks for the winter months.  Frozen ponds and lakes made expedient run-outs from sledding hills, and easy shortcuts on skis if you didn’t mind the wind.

Then the ice began to melt, or never formed at all.  There are now winters when the northern lakes remain as open water.  We’ve already added enough carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to warm the planet’s surface so that the average temperature across the United States in 2012 was over 3 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the average for the twentieth century. Worldwide, it is enough to melt an average of 142 gigatons of ice from the Greenland ice sheet each year since 1992.  Enough so that there may no longer be Arctic ice in summer by 2050.  Not even one hundred fifty years after the first European reached the North Pole, there may be no ice left there.


I have dozens of slides of glacial ice.  That summer, we fished it out of the shallows and used it in the field-camp coolers, and once we lugged it up to a wood-fired hot tub to cool the too-hot water.  We sat with the ancient ice bobbing around our chins, melting fast as the rain beat down and steam obscured the glacier across the lagoon.  At the time, the permanence of the thick fist of the glacier punching out of the mountain valley was unquestioned.  We marveled at the surreal colors and shapes and sounds, but not at the change that even then was washing away the permanence of ice, and the cultures and biota that depend on it.

I have dozens of slides.  I was young, and broke, and used cheap film.  The images are discolored and fading, as if they are from a much earlier time, yet not even a quarter century has passed since they were taken.  The scenes these images depict have all but disappeared. The glacier is gone, retreating far up the valley and far from the water’s edge.  There is no more ice in the bay or tidal lagoon, and only the recently ice-scoured rock still bare of vegetation gives any hint of how recently things were very different.

How fast does change have to occur before it breaks the illusion of ice-like stillness?  We stand on a lens of black-ice denial, thinking we’re separate from the processes changing the earth right beneath our feet.  It can be a deadly illusion in a world of melting ice.